There’s a version of a billing department that looks fine from the outside: Claims are going out, reports are being generated, and nobody is sending urgent emails about a crisis. 

And then there’s what’s happening internally: a small team quietly working through a backlog that never quite clears, handling denials reactively, and staying afloat mainly because everyone is working harder than they should have to. The wheels are still turning, but the gears are grinding. 

This is one of the more common and more costly situations in healthcare revenue cycle management. Your department is not in crisis, but it is at capacity. This means your hardworking team is stretched thin enough that small problems can become big ones before anyone has time to address them. 

Here are some signs that your billing team may be surviving rather than thriving, and what to do about it. 

The Warning Signs 

AR is aging in the wrong direction. When a team is at capacity, older claims get deprioritized in favor of keeping up with new submissions. The result is a gradual creep in your 60- and 90-day AR buckets. If your AR over 90 days is consistently above 10% of total receivables, that’s worth investigating. 

Denials are being closed, not resolved. A stretched team often closes denial queues by resubmitting or writing off rather than investigating root causes. If your denial rate is climbing or your write-off volume is increasing without a clear explanation, it may signal that denials are being managed for volume rather than outcomes. 

Reporting is reactive, not proactive. When teams are overwhelmed, reporting becomes something that happens when someone asks rather than something that drives decisions. If your billing team’s reports primarily answer questions after the fact rather than flagging trends in advance, that’s a capacity signal worth paying attention to. 

Turnover is higher than it should be. Billing staff who are consistently overloaded leave. If your team has seen meaningful turnover in the last 12 to 18 months, it’s worth asking whether workload played a role, because replacing experienced billing staff is expensive and slow. If you’re not asking already, make sure your exit interviews include an opportunity for exiting staff to address workload honestly. 

Follow-up timelines are slipping. Payers have timely filing limits, and appeals have deadlines. When a team is stretched, follow-up timelines are often the first thing that slips, which means revenue that could have been recovered quietly disappears instead. 

How to Support Your Hardworking Team Now 

The instinct when a billing team is struggling is often to look for a single fix: a new software system, a process overhaul, or a policy change. Those things can help, but they typically don’t address the core issue if the core issue is capacity. 

Start with an honest workload assessment. How many accounts is each team member managing? What is the ratio of claims to follow-up staff? Are there tasks being done manually that could be systematized or automated? Sometimes the answer is a workflow adjustment, and sometimes an assessment reveals that the team is simply understaffed for the volume they’re handling. 

Look at your denial data by root cause. Before assuming your team needs more training or better processes, find out whether your denial patterns are driven by avoidable errors (coding issues, missing information) or by payer behavior (incorrect contract rates, technical rejections). These require very different responses. 

Consider targeted outside support before a full overhaul. Hiring in healthcare is genuinely difficult right now. Experienced billing staff are in short supply, and onboarding takes time your revenue cycle may not have. One option worth considering is working with an external RCM organization that can step in for specific functions, such as AR cleanup on an aging backlog or consulting support to identify and fix process gaps, without requiring you to hand over your entire billing operation. 

The best external partners in this space don’t operate on an all-or-nothing model. They work alongside your internal team, filling gaps where the need is greatest and adjusting their involvement as your team’s capacity stabilizes. That kind of flexibility matters, especially for organizations that want to preserve their internal billing function while getting the support they need right now. 

The Bigger Picture 

A billing team that is merely surviving isn’t just about staffing. Every claim that ages past the point of recovery, every denial that gets written off instead of appealed, and every follow-up that slips past a filing deadline represents real money that should have made it into your organization. 

Addressing your team’s capacity before it reaches a breaking point is almost always less expensive and less disruptive than addressing it after. The signs are usually there early, and if your leadership team is looking for them, you can step in to support your dedicated billing team before they reach burnout. 

If your team is showing some of these signals and you’re not sure where to start, Practice Management offers AR cleanup and consulting services designed to work alongside existing billing teams, not replace them. Reach out to see how our services can slot into your existing structure – we’d love to help! 

image

Title

As we near the end of the year, many of the healthcare organizations we work with are beginning to look forward and plan for 2024. Part of this planning is updating, or even creating, a strategic plan. Strategic planning can be defined as “a process used by organizations to identify their goals, the str
Continue Readiing
image

Title

As we near the end of the year, many of the healthcare organizations we work with are beginning to look forward and plan for 2024. Part of this planning is updating, or even creating, a strategic plan. Strategic planning can be defined as “a process used by organizations to identify their goals, the str
Continue Readiing

Is Your Billing Team Keeping Up or Running on Empty? 

There’s a version of a billing department that looks fine from the outside: Claims are going out, reports are being generated, and nobody is sending urgent emails about a crisis. 

And then there’s what’s happening internally: a small team quietly working through a backlog that never quite clears, handling denials reactively, and staying afloat mainly because everyone is working harder than they should have to. The wheels are still turning, but the gears are grinding. 

This is one of the more common and more costly situations in healthcare revenue cycle management. Your department is not in crisis, but it is at capacity. This means your hardworking team is stretched thin enough that small problems can become big ones before anyone has time to address them. 

Here are some signs that your billing team may be surviving rather than thriving, and what to do about it. 

The Warning Signs 

AR is aging in the wrong direction. When a team is at capacity, older claims get deprioritized in favor of keeping up with new submissions. The result is a gradual creep in your 60- and 90-day AR buckets. If your AR over 90 days is consistently above 10% of total receivables, that’s worth investigating. 

Denials are being closed, not resolved. A stretched team often closes denial queues by resubmitting or writing off rather than investigating root causes. If your denial rate is climbing or your write-off volume is increasing without a clear explanation, it may signal that denials are being managed for volume rather than outcomes. 

Reporting is reactive, not proactive. When teams are overwhelmed, reporting becomes something that happens when someone asks rather than something that drives decisions. If your billing team’s reports primarily answer questions after the fact rather than flagging trends in advance, that’s a capacity signal worth paying attention to. 

Turnover is higher than it should be. Billing staff who are consistently overloaded leave. If your team has seen meaningful turnover in the last 12 to 18 months, it’s worth asking whether workload played a role, because replacing experienced billing staff is expensive and slow. If you’re not asking already, make sure your exit interviews include an opportunity for exiting staff to address workload honestly. 

Follow-up timelines are slipping. Payers have timely filing limits, and appeals have deadlines. When a team is stretched, follow-up timelines are often the first thing that slips, which means revenue that could have been recovered quietly disappears instead. 

How to Support Your Hardworking Team Now 

The instinct when a billing team is struggling is often to look for a single fix: a new software system, a process overhaul, or a policy change. Those things can help, but they typically don’t address the core issue if the core issue is capacity. 

Start with an honest workload assessment. How many accounts is each team member managing? What is the ratio of claims to follow-up staff? Are there tasks being done manually that could be systematized or automated? Sometimes the answer is a workflow adjustment, and sometimes an assessment reveals that the team is simply understaffed for the volume they’re handling. 

Look at your denial data by root cause. Before assuming your team needs more training or better processes, find out whether your denial patterns are driven by avoidable errors (coding issues, missing information) or by payer behavior (incorrect contract rates, technical rejections). These require very different responses. 

Consider targeted outside support before a full overhaul. Hiring in healthcare is genuinely difficult right now. Experienced billing staff are in short supply, and onboarding takes time your revenue cycle may not have. One option worth considering is working with an external RCM organization that can step in for specific functions, such as AR cleanup on an aging backlog or consulting support to identify and fix process gaps, without requiring you to hand over your entire billing operation. 

The best external partners in this space don’t operate on an all-or-nothing model. They work alongside your internal team, filling gaps where the need is greatest and adjusting their involvement as your team’s capacity stabilizes. That kind of flexibility matters, especially for organizations that want to preserve their internal billing function while getting the support they need right now. 

The Bigger Picture 

A billing team that is merely surviving isn’t just about staffing. Every claim that ages past the point of recovery, every denial that gets written off instead of appealed, and every follow-up that slips past a filing deadline represents real money that should have made it into your organization. 

Addressing your team’s capacity before it reaches a breaking point is almost always less expensive and less disruptive than addressing it after. The signs are usually there early, and if your leadership team is looking for them, you can step in to support your dedicated billing team before they reach burnout. 

If your team is showing some of these signals and you’re not sure where to start, Practice Management offers AR cleanup and consulting services designed to work alongside existing billing teams, not replace them. Reach out to see how our services can slot into your existing structure – we’d love to help! 

image

Title

As we near the end of the year, many of the healthcare organizations we work with are beginning to look forward and plan for 2024. Part of this planning is updating, or even creating, a strategic plan. Strategic planning can be defined as “a process used by organizations to identify their goals, the str
Continue Readiing
image

Title

As we near the end of the year, many of the healthcare organizations we work with are beginning to look forward and plan for 2024. Part of this planning is updating, or even creating, a strategic plan. Strategic planning can be defined as “a process used by organizations to identify their goals, the str
Continue Readiing

The Documentation Gap: How to Build Better Communication Between Clinical and Billing Teams (Part 2) 

In Part 1, we explored why clinical and billing teams struggle to communicate and what those communication breakdowns actually cost.  

What the numbers say:  

  • Coding mistakes contribute significantly to first-submission denials 

But here’s the good news: improving communication between your teams doesn’t require a complete operational overhaul. It requires intention, consistency, and a few foundational practices. 

Building the Bridge: What Actually Works 

Create shared understanding around documentation expectations 

Clinical teams don’t need to become coding experts, but they do need clarity on what information is critical and why it matters. When providers understand how their documentation directly impacts reimbursement and ultimately, their organization’s ability to sustain services, accuracy improves naturally. 

This is where a structured billing assessment can provide immediate value. By identifying exactly where documentation gaps are occurring and what specific information is missing or unclear, you create a roadmap for targeted improvement rather than vague “document better” directives that can often frustrate your providers even more. 

The key is making expectations specific and accessible. Instead of “document thoroughly,” try “every visit note for this service must include X, Y, and Z to meet payer requirements.” Give providers templates, examples, and clear guidance on what “sufficient documentation” looks like for the services they bill most frequently. 

Establish clear, respectful feedback loops 

When billing teams encounter documentation issues, there should be a defined process for communicating those issues back to clinical leadership. Your billing team should not be chasing down individual providers to give them personal notes on billing issues. Giving your team a pipeline to leadership keeps feedback constructive and systemic rather than feeling like individual criticism. 

The key is making feedback specific and actionable. “Needs better documentation” is not helpful. “The diagnosis doesn’t support the E/M level billed” or “Missing required elements for this CPT code” gives providers something tangible they can fix. 

Consider creating a regular (monthly or quarterly) summary of common documentation issues. Instead of addressing individual claims, look at patterns: “We’re seeing repeated denials for [specific service] because documentation is missing [specific element].” This approach reduces defensiveness and helps clinical leadership identify where targeted training or workflow changes are needed. 

Hold regular touchpoints between clinical and billing leadership 

These don’t need to be long meetings. Brief, recurring check-ins focused on trends and patterns (not individual claims) help shift the conversation from blame to problem-solving. 

Some discussion points we recommend: 

  • What documentation issues are we seeing repeatedly? 
  • What payer requirements have recently changed? 
  • Where are providers getting stuck or confused? 
  • What’s working well that we should reinforce? 

The goal is to create a feedback loop that allows both teams to learn and adjust continuously, rather than discovering problems only when denials pile up. 

Align metrics across teams 

If clinical teams are measured solely on patient volume and billing teams are measured solely on collection rates, you’ve created competing priorities. When both teams share responsibility for “clean claim rate” or “first-pass resolution rate,” you encourage shared accountability. 

Consider tracking metrics like: 

  • First-pass claim acceptance rate 
  • Days to clean claim submission 
  • Documentation query rate 
  • Denial rate by denial reason 

Share these metrics with both teams regularly and celebrate improvements together. This makes it clear: better communication gives everyone a win! 

The Role of Audits and Assessments 

One of the most effective ways to improve communication is to get an objective view of where things are breaking down. This is where coding audits and billing department assessments prove their value. 

A coding audit doesn’t just identify technical coding errors; it reveals patterns in how clinical documentation is (or is not) supporting the services being billed. You might discover that your providers are consistently missing key elements for certain types of visits, or that documentation expectations for a particular payer aren’t being communicated effectively. 

A billing department assessment can highlight where workflows, handoffs, or feedback processes are breaking down between clinical and revenue cycle staff. Sometimes the issue isn’t documentation quality, it’s that billing staff don’t have a clear way to escalate questions or that clinical staff never receive feedback on what they’re doing right. 

The beauty of an outside perspective is that it reduces internal friction. When a third party identifies communication gaps, it’s easier to address them as systems issues rather than personal failures. An objective assessment creates a shared starting point for improvement that both teams can rally around. 

What Better Communication Makes Possible 

When clinical and billing teams are aligned, the benefits show up quickly: 

  • Cleaner claims on first submission 
  • Faster reimbursement and more predictable cash flow 
  • Less time spent on rework and appeals 
  • Improved staff morale on both sides 
  • Clearer visibility into performance for leadership 

Most importantly, better communication allows everyone to focus on what really matters: delivering high-quality care to your community while maintaining the financial health that makes that care sustainable. 

Where to Start 

If you’re ready to improve how your clinical and billing teams work together, start with assessment. Before you can fix communication gaps, you need to understand exactly where they’re occurring and what’s causing them. 

A structured review of your documentation practices, billing workflows, and feedback systems will reveal specific opportunities for improvement. You might find that a few targeted changes (think clearer documentation templates, regular feedback meetings, or updated training on specific payer requirements) create significant momentum. 

The goal isn’t perfection. It’s progress! And progress starts with knowing where you actually are. 

If strengthening the connection between your clinical and billing teams is part of your operational priorities this year, we’d be glad to help you identify where to focus. Our billing assessments and coding audits are designed to give you clarity on what’s working, what’s not, and what specific steps will make the biggest difference for your organization.